A fundamental Hindu belief, as is the
case with practically all religions, is that there is one Supreme Being who is
‘the beginning, the middle, and the end of all living beings’.
The Supreme Being himself has no beginning and no end (anādi, anant); He represents
the totality of the cosmos. The concept of Supreme Being instils a sense of
humility that as human beings we are limited; only the Supreme Being is
unlimited.
This humility is reinforced by the
tradition that a Hindu is expected to dedicate to the Supreme Being all that he
does through his body, speech, senses, mind or intellect.
The tradition thus obliges a Hindu to always act with the noblest of thoughts
and the purest of means, laying a firm foundation for his ethics.
It should not be construed that, because
of their belief in one Supreme Being, Hindus are monotheistic in the same way
that the Christians and Muslims are. They worship many Gods who are considered
the varied manifestations of the Supreme Being. The tradition is that a Hindu
is free and ought to select his own God (iştadevata), a tradition that continues even today.
A second fundamental belief of the Hindus
is that the Supreme Being is both immanent and transcendent. He lives in the
heart of each and every living being, including the humans, the animals and the
plant life. Each living
being has thus its own individuality and is equally precious to the Supreme
Being.
The ultimate purpose of human life in the Hindu tradition is to realise this
Truth and finally merge with the Supreme Being. This pursuit is strictly individual.
Bhagavadgītā says: “Man should lift himself by himself, he should not lower himself. Man is
his own best friend; he is his own worst enemy.” Manusmŗti says that man should engage in the good conduct appropriate to his
own innate nature. He should take pains to avoid any activity under another’s
control. Everything under another person’s control is unhappiness, and
everything under one’s own control is happiness.
A Hindu’s pursuit of religion is thus
individualistic. Such regimentation as has emerged in recent times, with some
social and political repercussions, is more a reaction to the practices adopted
in Islam and Christianity.
A third fundamental belief is the
immortality of the ‘soul’ (the Supreme Being within each living being) and its
trans-migratory existence. On the death of a living being, the soul within does
not perish but migrates to another body and reborn according to some cosmic
design.
Along with such transmigration, the merits and demerits of one’s conduct and
actions in this life are also carried forward. Thus, the new life invariably
starts with ‘opening balance’ (to use the accounting terminology) that could be
either a credit balance or a debit balance. This belief, again, is a powerful
basis for the ethics of human beings. (An unfortunate consequence of this
belief is the frequent lapse into fatalism or determinism, to which we shall
revert later.)
As a corollary to these fundamental
beliefs the Hindus believe that all living beings belong to one family (vasudhaiva kutumbakam). “Each living
being in the universe is a manifestation of the Divine Being. Each form is a
self-projection, each movement a self-casting of the Lord. Whatever their
stages of development or the levels of manifestation they occupy, all are
equally divine in their essential truth and are so regarded by the Divine and
should be so regarded and felt by one who aspires to embody the Divine
Consciousness. Before the Divine there are no high and low; no chosen or
rejected, all are equal formulations of the One, each striving to manifest one
ray of the multiple splendour,” says ŖgVeda.
Īşā Upanişad says
that the whole world is but the abode of the Supreme Being and there is little
sense in craving for each other’s possessions.
Gandhiji derived his philosophy of
trusteeship (of the wealth that one accumulates) from this particular verse.
The Upanişad goes on to say that “he who sees all
beings in the very Self, and the Self in all beings, feels no hatred by virtue
of that realization.”
Bŗhadāraņyaka Upanişad says that the wife is dear to a man
not for the sake of the wife but for the sake of the Self (within him and her);
likewise, all the living beings are dear to him not for their sake but for the
sake of the Self (within him and them).
Bhagavadgītā exhorts that man should bear no ill will to any being but be
friendly and compassionate to all beings. He should wish well of all living
beings.
In the words
of Radhakrishnan, “the individual should grow in his
freedom and uniqueness and he should recognize the dignity of every man, even
the most insignificant. Man has not only to ascend to the world of spirit but
also to descend to the world of creatures (pasyed
brahmamayam jagat).”
Mahābhārata says: “whatever
pleases the people most is the truth since truthfulness, which means love of
humanity, is the only unconditional end.”
Also, it is said that Yudhiştira
desired to enter into all the suffering hearts and take all their suffering on
himself.
The Hindus normally end their prayers
with a concluding prayer: “Let all living beings be happy, let none suffer from
any affliction; let everyone perceive good things and let no one be
grief-stricken.”
The affirmative attitude of
the Hindus towards life is emphasized by the recognition of four basic human
goals called puruşārdhas,
“the great controllers of the world and the four
immortal guardians of our ambitions.” The four puruşārdhas
are: dharma
or righteous conduct, artha or
pursuit of wealth, kāma or fulfilment of
desires, and mokşa or
seeking freedom through communion with the Supreme Being. The first three
called the trivarga pave the way for mokşa.
Dharma or righteous conduct is as much an instrument as it is a
goal. Observing dharma in one’s life
is an end in itself. At the same time, it is also a means for achieving the
other three goals. The goal of kāma or seeking fulfilment of desires
is legitimate and indeed divine so long as it does not conflict with dharma. The suppression of legitimate desires often
leads to an unhealthy state of body and mind, and delays the attainment of mokşa or
liberation. Enjoyment of life, if rooted in dharma,
can be transformed into spiritual experience.
The scriptures are quite
clear that the four puruşārdhas are equally important. Indeed, they should be pursued sequentially. Man should divide his
time equally among dharma, artha and kāma. Man should also deploy his
wealth equally on dharma, artha and kāma.
The belief in the Supreme
Being or the pursuit of the ultimate goal of mokşa
should not lead to undue preoccupation
with the ‘other world’. As Vivekananda said, preoccupation with the ‘other world’ led to
the decline of the Indian society in the past. Arthaşāstra denounces ‘other-worldliness’
as an obstacle to accumulation of wealth.